Test how well coding agents can onboard to your product
ax-check.com. Task: ax-check.com by Gauge We check your site, then three agents try to onboard end to end. We give you concrete guidance on what to fix in your docs, marketing site, CLI, MCP, or Skills. Leaderboard RWX 100 VibeRaven 100 Qase 100 Gameye 100 Fly.io 100 Context.dev 100 Recent checks Tiden Tiden.ai's setup, docs, and pricing are clear and agent-ready. 82/100 RWX RWX docs and pricing are clear, but agents don't always report price. 100/100 VibeRaven VibeRaven's docs and pricing are fully readable by coding agents. 100/100 Skillprompting Homepage is agent-readable, but pricing and docs trail off fast 73/100 ReachLLM Agents find clear pricing and a working quickstart fast. 84/100 Atomic AGI Quickstart and pricing are clear, but discovery is weak 58/100; tools: custom-built or unnamed agent. Human role: The original post does not say how a person stayed involved.; limitations: Prerequisites include a public product URL and accessible documentation. The service relies on custom-built or unnamed agents, introducing uncertainty about model consistency. Human approval is required before implementing changes, as the source does not specify automated fix application..
Tools
custom-built or unnamed agent
Published on Agent Work Atlas:
Overview
ax-check.com
Workflow
ax-check.com by Gauge We check your site, then three agents try to onboard end to end. We give you concrete guidance on what to fix in your docs, marketing site, CLI, MCP, or Skills. Leaderboard RWX 100 VibeRaven 100 Qase 100 Gameye 100 Fly.io 100 Context.dev 100 Recent checks Tiden Tiden.ai's setup, docs, and pricing are clear and agent-ready. 82/100 RWX RWX docs and pricing are clear, but agents don't always report price. 100/100 VibeRaven VibeRaven's docs and pricing are fully readable by coding agents. 100/100 Skillprompting Homepage is agent-readable, but pricing and docs trail off fast 73/100 ReachLLM Agents find clear pricing and a working quickstart fast. 84/100 Atomic AGI Quickstart and pricing are clear, but discovery is weak 58/100
Reported result
The source provides example scores (e.g., ClickHouse 100/100, Fondo 29/100) but does not report measured business outcomes or conversion improvements for the service itself. Acceptance check: Verify that the generated report identifies at least one actionable documentation gap compared to manual review.
Human role
The original post does not say how a person stayed involved.
Limitations
Prerequisites include a public product URL and accessible documentation. The service relies on custom-built or unnamed agents, introducing uncertainty about model consistency. Human approval is required before implementing changes, as the source does not specify automated fix application.
Try it
Act as a technical writer evaluating agent readiness for [replaceable: product URL]. Use ax-check.com to run an onboarding test. Review the output for scores and specific guidance on docs, CLI, or MCP. Identify the top three barriers preventing agents from completing onboarding. Draft a remediation plan for these barriers. Do not publish changes without human review. First, run a dry test on [replaceable: sample URL] to confirm the tool returns actionable feedback. If the tool fails to return a score, report the error and suggest manual testing steps. Ensure the final report includes exact quotes from the tool's guidance.
Source reports are not independently verified. Publication date is the catalog publication date, not the original article date.